Tuesday, March 31, 2009

why I don't have a "nana"

Exhibit A: The nana we hired, who did sub-par cleaning, wasn't careful w/ cleaning products around the baby, and when told that the walls needing wiping (small hands, big dirt), said that she didn't like the wall texture, and wouldn't have it in her house (and then she proceeded to watch me clean the walls). Her indignation about Vivi and I napping, when Vivi was recovering from an ear infection during her "vacuuming time" didn't help things either.

Exhibit B: The nana I saw at the park, who, instead of noticing the little girl she was "watching" had to go to the bathroom (15 minutes of crotch-holding), looked at her nana friend's phone pictures, then took another 10 minutes, after little girl had wet herself, to notice, and then change her clothes in the middle of the crowded park.

Exhibit C: The nana who pushed a stroller all the way to the park, sat on a bench for 30 minutes, while the little boy she was "watching" watched other kids play, from his stroller. Then left.

Exhibit D: The general realization that nana's have no skills, no training, and very little education. They qualify for their job with the willingness to do it. And with their willingness to take very little money to raise other people's children. Badly.

I hope everyone who has, will, or might ask me, pityingly, why I don't have a nana, reads this and understands that I feel I am better qualified to take care of my child than a Peruvian whose only qualification for doing so is poverty. If I was a hard-core democrat (or a democrat at all, for that matter), I might agree with the sentiment of feeling obligated to provide employment for those who need it. But I'm not, and I don't. I'm off now to do some above par cleaning, then provide my child with a stimulating afternoon.

Sunday, March 15, 2009

adventures, mishaps, lessons

I was recently re-reading the Chile guidebook, which makes a bit more sense now that I've got a better feel for Santiago and the country as a whole. It said something about how the people here are friendly (but really, how many guidebooks say that the locals are assholes?) but that foreigners are always foreigners. I found myself nodding, because although I have felt right at home with the expat community, with Chileans...not so much. We invited a number of people to Vivi's birthday BBQ, and I found it curious that none of the Chileans came. We had a German, Spaniard, a bunch of Brits, a Dutchman, and some other Americans (I think...) but no Chileans. The concept of foreigners is odd to me, as an American, because in a place like Los Angeles, and increasingly in more of the country, no one is a foreigner. I think about the people I worked with in Pasadena. I had colleagues from Nigeria, Jordan, Mexico, all over Central America, South Africa, and others (that I often times wasn't aware of their original origin, or didn't even notice and think to ask) and I never thought of them as "foreigners." They were, like me, Americans. It's things like this that make me realize why it's difficult to ever feel like you fit somewhere. I wonder if those colleagues sometimes didn't feel like they fit, because there was an attitude that was different, that they just couldn't get used to. I like to think that they felt like Americans, but now that I've been the "foreigner" it makes me wonder how they felt different from me as Americans.

I also had a "I just don't fit in" moment at the supermarket. I had done a big shopping trip, with Vivi with me, and we were at the checkout. The checkout, at any store here, moves very, very slowly. The checker didn't seem to care that people were tired, restless, and doing their best to entertain small children with what little help existed at the checkout stand. (Whoever said a pack of gum isn't a good toy?) There were drinks nearby, so I grabbed a Sprite and opened it, glad to have some relief from the heat generated by so many bodies waiting to pay and get out of there. I said aloud, which I find myself doing more and more (the freedom of most people not understand you) that I would pay for it only if I hadn't finished it when it was my turn to check out. I drank the drink, and I was still waiting, so I put the can next to the conveyer belt, but not on it. I realized at the time that this was something I would NEVER, EVER do in the US. I had lectured my students many times on how shoplifting raises prices for everyone, and it's not fair to everyone else who pays.

And you know why I didn't pay for that drink? Because this isn't my country. I don't care about whether or not prices go up in the long run. I'm leaving in two years. I don't care if soft drinks cost $20 each and the entire country dies of thirst (well, I do care about my expat friends. But Chileans...not so much).

I know, I know , it was wrong. I'm setting a bad example for my child. But just give me a chance to explain what else I learned from this experience. If the Chilean policia read this and come after me, I at least want evidence that the experience gave me insight into the psyche of shoplifters.

I realized that all the times I had conversations with my students, and after my lecture about why they shouldn't shoplift, they shrugged and said, "I don't care." Now I know what they meant! They meant, "This isn't my place. I'm not part of it, so I don't care what happens to it. I'm just trying to survive and get what I can out of it." Wrong or right, I believe this is part of the reason for crime. People are looking for a way to make a place theirs, whether that's with graffiti, or gangs, or they don't care, so they do things, like shoplifting, with a feeling of disconnection.

So there's my lesson. I plan to pay for my next drink. And I have given larger than normal tips to the baggers at that market since then as a way to compensate ($ doesn't go to the store, but it's more coming from me). And I hope that the insight I gained from the experience will make me a better teacher, parent, and citizen of wherever I am in two years.